Bakugou Katsuki (Boku no Hero Academia) #2938849
Entry by Doopliss 8 weeks ago.
Sakimichan, Boku no Hero Academia, Todoroki Shouto, Bakugou Katsuki, Midoriya Izuku, Spotlight, Grenade, Revision, Fanart From DeviantART, deviantART, Fanart From Pixiv, Pixiv
684x1000
588kB
Comments (English)
-
27 weeks ago
Work it bakugo~
-
The true revision is here
2018年11月19日上午9点18分
Published: November 13, 2018 -
#2415113, #2720646, #2822947, #2726398, etc.
I really don't know why you could confuse all cases about the revison from Sakimichan OMG...
Your evidences NEVER PROVE ANYTHING.
Please do not fight meaningless battles.
Don't forget your cases here they have the same situation:
The SAME PUBLISHED DATE.
You gave the cases above,except the case 002 #2415113and Azura#2822947v.s old version on pixiv,
https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/69126384
,so I report the pixiv ver JUST BECAUSE THE VISIBLE MIS, otherwise that will maybe just my subjective thinking for applying replacement forever...
Now,
I give the all contrast for the cases you give>>
Published: October 24, 2017
2017年10月24日早上8点30分
Published: November 23, 2017
2017年11月23日上午9点19分
*But #2822947 has visible evidence thus could be regarded as safe revision.
Published: May 9, 2019
2019年5月9日上午10点27分
By the way,#2578004 was deleted just because it with compressing artifacts,not about "which one is revision".(It means:Even I could apply restore #2578004 to be grouped under #2726398,maybe it'll be allowed because they have different details just only couldn't be judged which is the newest version)=_______=
The last one but most be clarified Solemnly:
#2445395was JUST PAID REWARDS,WE SHOULDN'T JUDGE CASES USING THAT AS THE FINAL BASIS
=====
As for the discussion of revision judgements "basing on paid rewards",well,I must be honest, I had found Sakimichan had set and choose her "finally paid rewards" "go back" to "the first free versions", that means,the free version maybe revision,but the paid rewards be a newer revision,again,so paid rewards,just paid rewards,we had banned all paid rewards now,that's unfair we deal with replacements in new rules,but "still based the banned contents to judge the cases act in new rule,that's paradox.
"Go back to the fist free version to set the paid rewards",That's true,maybe lots of the examples (paid rewards) had been almost deleted I couldn't find them,but it is visibly the best example like this still could be found:
#1799649 vs #1934013
Well,if "paid rewards always be the right/best version",so may you tell me why Sakimichan choose the "Wrong drawing Hitai-ate" version be the final paid rewards version?
I don't know,but it happened.
And if you never see #1934013,"the final free version #1799649 will be the best final version" in ZC.
So do you know why I feel that way you set not truly be the best and justice? =o
===== -
Idk why you put dates, that doesn't prove nothing too, Sakimichan shared this revision freely on her DA. I'm not confusing nothing, the pictures can be replaced without deleting the original post, so, when that happen, the dates seems like the picture was uploaded the same day of the first upload, you already should know that fact...
Like you said, The Zero Two one from Pixiv has six fingers and the DA has the correction, the Azura Pixiv one has six fingers and the DA has the correction, the Ahri Pixiv one has little hand and the DA has the correction, and the Momo one was not exactly replaced just for CA, the DA one has a correction on her chin, having said that, it's clearly that the Pixiv ones are not always the best/corrected/final version.
I'm not who made the rules here, the free versions of the Paid Rewards are the ones that kept because people paid for them, mods already said it. You are the one who "fight" meaningless battles... -
Edited :
Sakimichan had “Revised again" in the paid reward version, no one could be the same with it.
Guys, if you would like to continue to contribute the arts they have patreon versions, BE CAREFULL,I must suggest sincerely. -
why are you making reports on comments ? there's a report button right there if you want to report a revision, you've done this countless times why do you keep repeating it again and again and again, stop harassing the uploaders, please. The guy stopped replying weeks ago but you still won't stop, why? Do mods not exist? can he delete his pic himself? No, he can't and mods exist so report to them. This is your last warning.
-
@flame2frost
Mod flame2frost:
I didn't report it in comment,where did you see that...?
I didn't harass him,either. The opposite of, I only give the true and trace about the case discussing,then give a suggestion to every uploaders,even,don't worry,if a stuff be comment then be shown on ZC homepage so often,it'll get more +favs,I didn't hurt anyone,if this pic is proper.
The opposite of,if you couldn't keep neutral and calm to see every cases/words in deletion apply but only vent personal emotions here and every time,maybe I don't would like to need your help in this time. -
.....why are you people even arguing over things like image revisions and dates and whatnot? Does it really matter? I couldn't care less about 'paid' versions or revisions or whatever. It's a nice pic of Bakugou, I'm just gonna enjoy it for what it is. A picture. ._.
-
@alenas
Umm,because that will be the different credited to uploaders,alenas-san. -
We're just uploaders, we don't own them, there's no credit. Just deletion and uploading so kindly STOP targeting the uploader in comments. And use the report button like a normal person. You don't see others spamming on pics with links to their images and talking about revisions do you? So don't do it. We've had enough of you. Seriously.
